Old Indian Women Boobs

Sentenza della Corte di Cassazione

T ANTO TO KNOW

For

the Court Supreme

impose a religious faith and abuse in the family.

Religious faith is a free choice and can not be imposed in the family.

the Court (Sixth Chamber of n.64/2010 penalty), dealing with the case of a Jehovah's Witness who wanted to impose at all costs to his wife his religious beliefs,

has stressed that

"the imposition of other's religious convictions"

is a

"conduct consciously anti-juridical "

unlawful conduct and is punishable under Article. 572 of the Penal Code which punishes the abuse in the family with the penalty of imprisonment from one to five years.

The story had a tragic outcome as culminated in the murder of the woman but the man was on trial for abuse in the family.

Using the Supreme Court the accused tried to defend himself against the ill-treatment by supporting the vision of family relationships internal to its religious denomination

'and' characterized by a relationship based on the supremacy of man "

and that no charges had ever complained

" As the dispute of normality 'of the accession to the vision of life. "

The judges of Piazza Cavour rejected the appeal noting that

" l 'continued imposition of behavior that is not shared with his wife made the adherence to religious beliefs simply because of the unlawful conduct irrelevant to exclude criminal responsibility'. "

( Date: 17/01/2010 - Author: Roberto Cataldi)

E’ questa una sentenza importantissima in quanto afferma, a chiare lettere, un principio sul quale ci si può basare allorchè si verta nel campo delle c.d. “ sette religiose”.